DNA Databank Debate: Should Everyone Be There?
Edward J. Imwinkelried, a law professor and a specialist in evidence, was quoted in the Richmond Times-Dispatch on March 8, 2007. The article points out that as more databanks are being developed across the country, the controversy over whose DNA should be in forensic databanks has increased.
"The real issue we ought to be focusing on is, should we have a universal database?" said Imwinkelried in the article. "Until we have that intelligent debate, we're not going to really get off the dime."
While opponents of a universal DNA databank have expressed concern about the misuse of genetic information by employers, insurers, and others, Imwinkelried contends that a universal database would maximize deterrence. The current system, he said, "is not a deterrent at all, really, to the person who has yet to be apprehended or yet to be convicted.”
Richmond Times-Dispatch/March 8, 2007
"The real issue we ought to be focusing on is, should we have a universal database?" said Imwinkelried in the article. "Until we have that intelligent debate, we're not going to really get off the dime."
While opponents of a universal DNA databank have expressed concern about the misuse of genetic information by employers, insurers, and others, Imwinkelried contends that a universal database would maximize deterrence. The current system, he said, "is not a deterrent at all, really, to the person who has yet to be apprehended or yet to be convicted.”
Richmond Times-Dispatch/March 8, 2007